Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant: Ms R Chapman, instructed by Wilson & Co For the Respondent: Mr C Buckley, Home Office Presenting Officer
He also pointed out that there was no evidence that the Appellant had an answer to the discrepancy, let alone a persuasive one.
The Surendran guidelines and MNM should be read with what we have set out above.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.