Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             The appellant, a national of Pakistan, appeals, with the permission of Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Doyle, the decision of Judge Ruck promulgated on 13 October 2023 dismissing his appeal against the respondent's refusal of 13 April 2023 of his international protection claim made on 6 May 2020.
             The RFRL continued to consider the position on the alternative basis that the appellant had worked for IJT or had started his own political party and considered that as a low level member of an opposition party he would not be of interest to the authorities; if he had been the recipient of adverse attention from Jamaat-e-Islami there would be sufficiency of protection for him from the authorities or he would be able to internally relocate and that would be reasonable.
             The judge noted that the issues in dispute at the hearing were agreed as being:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.