Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This is an appeal to the Upper Tribunal, with permission, by the Appellants with regard to a determination of the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Brenells) promulgated on 16 th April 2014.
The Appellants had initially sought entry clearance as family visitors to visit the Sponsor, the first Appellant's brother-in-law. Those applications were refused but subsequently allowed on appeal by the First-tier Tribunal.
However, when attempting to travel to the UK the first Appellant was denied boarding because his passport was damaged. He obtained a replacement passport and then attended the British High Commission to have his visa transferred to his replacement passport. He also produced the previous passport. Examination of that passport led the Entry Clearance Officer to conclude that it had been tampered with as a result of which the visa was cancelled. The second Appellant being a child and dependent upon the first Appellant being able to travel, her Visa was also cancelled.
The appeals came before the First-tier Tribunal at Taylor House on 4 th April 2014 when the Appellants were represented by the Sponsor, as they were before me.
In his determination the Judge set out the reasons for the visa being cancelled and the first paragraph of that refusal states as follows:-
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.