Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Appellant is a citizen of Afghanistan, now aged 19 years. Her appeal originates in a decision of the Entry Clearance Officer, Islamabad (the � ECO �) dated 20 December 2013, whereby her application for entry clearance to the United Kingdom for the purpose of family reunion was refused. Her ensuing appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (the � FtT �) was dismissed. She appeals with permission to this Tribunal.
The decision of the ECO states, firstly, that the Appellant�s application for � family reunion entry clearance � was considered under paragraph 352A of the Immigration Rules. This provision of the Rules specifies the requirements to be satisfied by a person seeking leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom as the spouse or civil partner of a refugee. They are as follows:
� (i) the applicant is married to or the civil partner of a person who is currently a refugee granted status as such under the Immigration Rules in the United Kingdom; and
(ii) the marriage or civil partnership did not take place after the person granted asylum left the country of his former habitual residence in order to seek asylum; and
(iii) the applicant would not be excluded from protection by virtue of Article 1F of the [Refugee Convention] if he were to seek asylum in his own right; and
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.