Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
LORD JUSTICE MOSES MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT HIS HONOUR JUDGE GILBERT QC (Sitting as a Judge of the CACD) ____________________
Computer Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of WordWave International Limited A Merrill Communications Company 190 Fleet Street London EC4A 2AG Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838 (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
Mr B Thorogood appeared on behalf of the Appellant Mr S Rose appeared on behalf of the Crown ____________________
Thus the trial was conducted on the basis that that young complainant had been raped and the issue was whether the prosecution could make the jury sure that it was this applicant. The jury was sure that it was.
That is for obvious reasons since, absent allegations of abuse, any doctor would be most reluctant to invade the privacy of a girl of that age.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.