Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The unanimous decision of the tribunal is that the claimant�s claims of direct discrimination, harassment, and victimisation on the grounds of age are dismissed against all respondents.
The claimant was represented by Ms A Jones, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by Comerton & Hill, Solicitors.
The respondents were represented by Mrs M Whittaker, of Peninsula Business Services Ltd.
1.������ The claimant claimed that he had been subjected to unlawful discrimination by the respondents on the grounds of age.� The respondents denied his allegations in their entirety.
�(1)���� Whether the respondents subjected the claimant to less favourable treatment on grounds of age, contrary to Regulation 3 of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2006, as amended (�the Regulations�) .
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.