Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant: Miss R Frantzis, Counsel, instructed by Legal Justice Solicitors
This is the Appellant's appeal against the decision of Judge Grimshaw made following a hearing at Bradford on 3 rd July 2014.
In May 2013 the Appellant returned to the UK for a visit and to spend time with his family. He made an in time application for leave to remain on the basis of his family and private life in the UK.
The Secretary of State refused the application under Appendix FM of the Immigration Rules. The Appellant could not succeed under the partner route because E-LTRP2.1 requires that the applicant must not be a visitor. Neither could he succeed under the parent route because he did not have sole responsibility for his child, nor under private life because he had not lived continuously in the UK for the requisite period.
The Secretary of State then considered whether there were any exceptional circumstances. In the refusal letter she wrote:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.