Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Ms Kate Branigan QC, Mr Andrzej Bojarski for the Applicant Mr Alex Verdan QC, Mr John Tughan for the 1st Respondent Mr Charles Geekie QC, Ms Sorrel Dixon for the 2nd Respondent Ms Fawzia King for the 3rd & 4th Respondents Hearing dates: 18th, 19th, 20th, 21st, 24th, 25th January, 2nd - 4th February & 7th & 9th February 2011 ____________________
(i) The medical assessment of the physical findings of sexual abuse has a considerable subjective element;
(ii) With the exception of cases involving clearly diagnostic findings such as semen, the medical findings should not pre-dominate in the assessment of sexual abuse;
(iii) Sexual abuse cannot be diagnosed on the presence of physical findings alone.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.