Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
       The appellant appeals to the Upper Tribunal (UT) by permission given by the First-tier Tribunal (FTT). On 8.3.24 permission to appeal to the UT was given by FTTJ Stuart PJ Buchanan on two grounds only, namely:
                           (i)             "T here is no further elaboration about why the account was not thought plausible (rather than, for arguments sake, not detailed enough).
                        (ii)             It is arguable that the date in October 2023 when the appellant formally produced his mother's statement dated March 2023, is not a material factor in assessing the appellant's account."
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.