Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Appellants are citizens of Bangladesh born on 15 th February 1983, 24 th April 1982 and 4 th July 1985 respectively. The second and third Appellants are husband and wife and the third Appellant's appeal depends on the result of the second Appellant's appeal.
The appellants appealed against the decision of the Respondent dated 16 th June 2015 refusing the combined application of the first two Appellants for leave to remain in the United Kingdom as Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) Migrants. Their appeals were heard by Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Callender Smith on 16 th September 2016. The appeal was dismissed under the Immigration Rules and on human rights grounds in a decision promulgated on 13 th March 2017.
Counsel for the Appellants submitted that if I find there to be a material error of law in the decision the claims should be remitted back to the Respondent. The Presenting Officer agreed to that but only if a material error of law is found.
Counsel submitted that if I find that there is a material error of law in the decision he will make further submissions.
At paragraph 32 the judge states that there is a significant and serious discrepancy in the key figures quoted by the first 2 Appellants in interview, in respect of what the other said and no reason has been given for that discrepancy.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.