Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
1.������ The claimant did not attend the hearing; but the tribunal considered the documents before it and the response lodged by the respondent acknowledging the debt.� Based on the information before me, I make the following findings of fact.
2.������ The claimant was employed by the respondent from October 2009 until his employment ended on 24 June 2011.�
3.������ At the date of termination of the employment the claimant�s gross weekly wage was �284.38 and his net weekly wage was �233.00.�
4.������ The claimant�s employment ceased when he was dismissed with immediate effect.� No dismissal procedure whatsoever was followed by the respondent.�
5.������ The claimant makes claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay and notice pay.� He seeks �111.00 unpaid wages and two days� holiday pay.�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.