Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Richard Harrison KC and Miss Samantha Ridley for the father Mr Teertha Gupta KC and Miss Fitzrene Headley for the mother Ms Dorothea Gartland for the child by his children's Guardian Mr Thomas Jones for the Secretary of State for the Home Department Hearing date: 27 February 2023 ____________________
a) communications under rule 12.73(1)(a), which may be made as a matter of right;
b) communications under rule 12.73(1)(c) and Practice Direction 12G paragraphs 1 and 2, which may be made but are subject to any direction by the court, including in appropriate circumstances, a direction that they should not be made, and
c) other communications, which under 12.73(1)(b) may only be made with the court's permission.
It is common ground that neither (a) or (b) above applies in this case and that the fact-finding judgment can only be disclosed to the SSHD if the court gives permission for this to occur.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.