Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(4) Representations advanced on behalf of the Applicant by his solicitor, dated 14 December 2020.
(5) A letter written for the purpose of this application (and, effectively, to me) by the Applicant.
(1) On 5 August 2015 he received an adjudication for disobeying a lawful order. The Applicant, and four others, refused to leave a classroom when instructed to do so.
(2) On 22 May 2018 he received an adjudication for using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour. When Ms Doward had told the Applicant to leave the kitchen office he had turned to her and called her, in front of other prisoners, a "rude prick and a fucking idiot.". His solicitor explains that this was an isolated comment borne out of understandable frustration. It is correctly pointed out that, notwithstanding this incident, Officer Doward has written a highly supportive account of the Applicant's progress.
The prisoner has made exceptional progress during his sentence, resulting in a significant alteration in his maturity and attitude since the commission of the offence.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.