Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Whereas the original respondent is the appealing party, I shall, in the interests of convenience and consistency, replicate the nomenclature of the decision at first instance.
The Appellant is a citizen of Bangladesh. The appellant is married to Atiqa Kauser and on February 21, 2014 he applied for a variation of his leave to remain due to his continuing family and private life with his wife. The respondent refused his application on March 17, 2014 on the basis the Immigration Rules were not met and took a decision to issue directions for his removal pursuant to Section 47 of the Immigration, Asylum and nationality Act 2006.
The Appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal under Section 82(1) Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (hereinafter called the 2002 Act), as amended, on April 3, 2014. The matter came before Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Shamash (hereinafter called �the FtTJ�) on November 17, 2014 and she allowed his appeal in a determination promulgated on January 5, 2015.
The respondent lodged grounds of appeal on January 12, 2015. Permission to appeal was granted Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Robertson on February 12, 2015.
The matter came before me on the date set out above. The appellant was in attendance and represented by his counsel.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.