Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             The appellant appealed the respondent's decision dated 21 February 2020 to refuse a human rights claim.
             First-tier Tribunal Judge Wyman dismissed the appeal in a decision sent on 10 August 2021.
             A panel of the Upper Tribunal found that the First-tier Tribunal decision involved the making of an error of law in a decision sent as long ago as 18 March 2022 (Annex 1).
             The resumed hearing for remaking the decision was listed on 11 July 2024. It is unclear why it took so long for the case to be listed for remaking. There was no appearance by or on behalf of the appellant. The hearing was adjourned for the reasons given in the directions made by Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Lewis (Annex 2).
             Another date was given for a resumed hearing for remaking the decision on 07 October 2024. Again, the appellant did not engage with the appeal process. No up to date evidence was sent to the Upper Tribunal as suggested in the earlier directions. Once again, there was no appearance by or on behalf of the appellant.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.