Skip to main content

Search Notes Common Room Case Library Flashcards Quizzes Past Papers SQE Tutors Leaderboard

Home›Case Library›L, R v

Criminal

L, R v

[2015] EWCA Crim 1792Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)2015

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Criminal cases →

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.

Quick orient — first passages from judgment

LADY JUSTICE RAFFERTY DBE MRS JUSTICE LANG DBE and MRS JUSTICE PATTERSON DBE ____________________

Miss Adrienne Lucking QC for the Respondant Peter McCartney for the Appellant Hearing date: 15th October 2015 ____________________

Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

Official
Read on National Archives
Official UK government case law repository
Mirror
Read on BAILII
British and Irish Legal Information Institute
Web
Find via Google
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately

More Criminal cases

R v Robert Michael Thomas

[2026] EWCA Crim 305

R v Richard Alexander Welsh

[2026] EWCA Crim 466

R v Nigel Roberts

[2026] EWCA Crim 76

R v Nilesh Goutam

[2026] EWCA Crim 332

Appeal against Conviction by Kassim Ashley Green Nicholas against His Majesty's Advocate (High Court of Justiciary)

[2026] ScotHC 2026hcjac9

R v Adam Culverwell

[2026] EWCA Crim 203

Common Room

Discussion

0 comments · About the Common Room →

Log in to comment. Discussions are part of the Common Room.

No comments yet — start the discussion.

Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.

caselaw

AI-generated briefs should be verified against the source judgment. This tool is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.

[email protected]

StudyCase Library Browse A–Z Notes Flashcards Quizzes Past Papers Guides Blog Topics

ToolsAll tools OSCOLA Case Finder Glossary Court hierarchy LLB SQE1 Oxford BA

CaselawAbout How it works Pricing For universities For law firms FAQ Changelog Contact Press

TrustSecurity Accessibility Status Terms Privacy Acceptable use Refunds Sign up

Used by Oxford law students·Powered by Anthropic AI·Cases from The National Archives·Payments by Stripe·GDPR Compliant

SQE revision content is produced by Caselaw independently. Caselaw is not affiliated with the SRA, Kaplan, or any official SQE provider. Refunds · Terms

© 2026 caselaw. All rights reserved.