Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
I have considered whether any parties require the protection of an anonymity direction. No anonymity direction was made previously in respect of this Appellant. Having considered all the circumstances and evidence I do not deem it necessary to make an anonymity direction.
This is an appeal by the Appellant against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Grimes after a paper appeal decided on 17 February 2014, which dismissed the Appellant�s appeal on all grounds .
On 5 September 2012 when the Appellant was 17 years old she applied for entry clearance to the United Kingdom as the child of Kadiatu Kargbo a British Citizen.
On 5 April 2013 the Entry Clearance Officer in Accra refused the Appellant�s application on the basis that the Appellant did not meet the requirements of paragraph 297(i) (e) of the Rules on the basis that she had not established that the sponsor had sole responsibility for her upbringing.
The Appellant appealed asserting that her mother had supported her significantly throughout her life and therefore had sole responsibility but also stated that her father had died during the rebel war and therefore her case should also have been considered under paragraph 297(i)(d) of the Rules which is the requirement whereby the applicant is seeking ILR as the child of a parent settled in the United Kingdom and the other parent is dead .
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.