Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellants (a brother and sister) were born on 25 May 1994 and 1 June 1996 respectively and are citizens of Bangladesh. On 9 August 2012, the ECO decided to refuse their applications for entry clearance to the United Kingdom for settlement. The appellants appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Sarsfield) which, in a determination promulgated on 30 April 2013, dismissed the appeals. The appellants now appeal, with permission, to the Upper Tribunal.
The applications fell to be considered under paragraph 297 of HC 395 (as amended):
�297. The requirements to be met by a person seeking indefinite leave to enter the United Kingdom as the child of a parent, parents or a relative present and settled or being admitted for settlement in the United Kingdom are that he:
(i) is seeking leave to enter to accompany or join a parent, parents or a relative in one of the following circumstances:
(c) one parent is present and settled in the United Kingdom and the other is being admitted on the same occasion for settlement; or
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.