Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Paul Hepher (instructed by Wilson Solicitors LLP) for the applicant Andrew Venables (instructed by Duncan Lewis Solicitors) for the respondent Hearing dates: 02.02.23-03.02.23 ____________________
i.� That which arises under Article 13 (b) -�there is grave risk that the children's return would expose them to physical or psychological harm, or otherwise place them in an intolerable situation
ii.�� That the two eldest children object to being returned, and have attained an age and degree of maturity where it is appropriate to take into account their views�
iii. That which arises under Article 13 (a) - the Father had acquiesced in the retention��
"The States signatory to the present Convention, firmly convinced that the interests of children are of paramount importance in matters relating to their custody, desiring to protect children internationally from the harmful effects of their wrongful removal or retention and to establish procedures to ensure their prompt return to the State of their habitual residence, as well as to secure protection for rights of access, have resolved to conclude a Convention to this effect, and have agreed upon the following provisions."
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.