Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
A member of the Specialist Appeals Team settled the Entry Clearance Officer's application for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal.
On 29 May 2015 Upper Tribunal Judge Kebede granted the Entry Clearance Officer permission to appeal on a renewed application to the Upper Tribunal, permission having previously been refused by a First-tier Tribunal Judge:
There is some arguable merit in the renewed grounds, that the judge, in concluding that the [Entry Clearance Officer] had failed to discharge the burden of proof, arguably erred by rejecting the [Entry Clearance Officer's] unchallenged allegation of deception, as appears at paragraph [25] of his decision, which in turn arguably infected his overall findings.
At the hearing before me, I received extensive submissions from both Mr Wilding and Mr Hossain on the question of whether an error of law was made out and, if so, how the decision should be remade.
In his application form, the claimant left blank question 3 which asked him about other names, including any names that he was known by and/or other names that he had been known by.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.