Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             The appellant appeals, with permission, the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Thorne ("the judge") who dismissed the appellant's appeal by way of a decision dated 13 April 2024 ("the decision"). That appeal was against the respondent's refusal of his application to the European Union Settlement Scheme as contained within Appendix EU of the Immigration Rules ("EUSS"). The respondent's decision was dated 25 July 2023.
             There is an unusual procedural background and an important factual background to this appeal so we set out the relevant background in a little more detail than might otherwise be the case.
             The hearing before the judge took place on 26 March 2024. The appellant was represented at the hearing. The decision was dated 13 April 2024.
             On the issue of the 'invalid' identification document, the judge noted the appellant's oral evidence at [15] that he could not obtain any other documents from his wife as she was not co-operating with him. The judge also noted the appellant's evidence that he and his wife were now living apart and were in the process of obtaining a divorce, but they had lived as man and wife for a period of 5 years.
             Nevertheless, at [17]-[20] the judge said:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.