Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
I have considered whether any parties require the protection of an anonymity direction. No anonymity direction was made previously in respect of this Appellant. Having considered all the circumstances and evidence I do not consider it necessary to make an anonymity direction.
The Secretary of State for the Home Department brings this appeal but in order to avoid confusion the parties are referred to as they were in the First-tier Tribunal. This is an appeal by the Secretary of State against a decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Kempton promulgated on 27 January 2015 which allowed the Appellant�s appeal under the Immigration Rules.
The Appellant applied for entry clearance to join her husband Mohamed Runu Miah.
On 13 March 2014 the Secretary of State refused the Appellant�s application. The refusal letter gave a number of reasons:
(a) The letter conceded that the sponsor was exempted from meeting the requirements of Paragraph E-ECP.3.1 as they are in receipt of DLA but they must however meet the requirements of E-ECP.3.3 and show that the Sponsor is able to maintain and accommodate them adequately in the United Kingdom without recourse to public funds.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.