Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr. Richard Arnold QC and Ms Marie Demetriou (instructed by Messrs Wragge & Co) for the Claimants Mr. Mark Platts-Mills QC and Mr. James Abrahams (instructed by Messrs Lewis Silkin) for the Defendant Hearing dates: Tuesday, 1st and 2nd March 2005 ____________________
Article 3.2 provides that Member States may provide that a trade mark shall not be registered or if registered shall be liable to be declared to be invalid where and to the extent that:
Thus s.10(2) and s.10(3) correspond, respectively, to Articles 5.1(b) and 5.2 of the Directive.
There is no provision in the Trade Mark Directive, whether in Article 6 or elsewhere, corresponding to s.10(6). It is this omission which prompts question 5 as set out in the appendix to this judgment.
S.47 provides that a mark may be declared to be invalid on the ground that it was registered in breach of s.3.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.