Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Lingam) which, in a determination promulgated on 4 March 2014, dismissed the appeal under the Immigration Rules but allowed it under Article 8 ECHR. The ECO now appeals, with permission, to the Upper Tribunal.
Mr John McGirr on behalf of the ECO submitted a First-tier Tribunal application for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on 19 March 2014. The application contains the following statement:
This allowed appeal was, apparently, served on 4.3.14. However, it was not received in the Home Office until 12.3.14. It is not know why there was this delay. However, it is respectfully submitted that this therefore makes today the last day to lodge an application in-time.
The respondent seeks permission to appeal, in time, against the decision of First-tier Judge Lingam who, in a determination promulgated on 4 March 2014, allowed the appeal of the appellant against the refusal of his application for entry clearance as a spouse and thus of his children.
The grounds of appeal complain that the judge failed to approach Article 8 correctly.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.