Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
[3 ] There was no dispute between the parties to this appeal as to the relevant statutory background. Section 1(1) of the 2004 Act provides that:
"A child or young person has additional support needs for the purposes of this Act where, for whatever reason, the child or young person is, or is likely to be, unable without the provision of additional support to benefit from school education provided or to be provided for the child or young person".
Section 1(3) of the 2004 Act provides that "additional support" means "....provision which is additional to, or otherwise different from, the educational provision made generally for children...". Section 2(1) of the 2004 Act provides
"For the purposes of this Act, a child or young person requires a plan (referred to in this Act as a 'co-ordinated support plan') for the provision of additional support if -
(a) an education authority are responsible for the school education of the child or young person ....".
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.