Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The matter comes before the Upper Tribunal to determine whether the First-tier Tribunal decision involved the making of an error of law.
I heard submissions from both parties, which have been noted in my record of proceedings and where relevant are incorporated into my findings.
After having considered the grounds of appeal and the oral arguments I am satisfied that the First-tier Tribunal decision did not involve the making of an error of law.
�Generally the protection of family life under Article 8 involves cohabiting dependents, such as parents and their dependent minor children. Whether it extends to other relationships depends on the circumstances of the particular case. Relationships between adults, a mother and her 33 year old son in the present case, would not necessarily acquire the protection fo Article 8 of the Convention without evidence of further elements of dependency, involving more than the normal emotional ties.�
For the reasons given above I conclude that the First-tier Tribunal decision did not involve the making of an error of law. The decision shall stand.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.