Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
UIN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) UON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE UQUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION UADMINISTRATIVE COURT UMr Justice Cranston U [2016] EWHC 2134 (Admin) URoyal Courts of Justice UStrand, London, WC2A 2LL 22 November 2017 B e f o r e :
ULORD JUSTICE PATTEN ULORD JUSTICE HENDERSON Uand ULADY JUSTICE ASPLIN ____________________
Lord Pannick QC, Philip Woolfe and Stefan Kuppen (instructed by James Blendis at EE Ltd) for the Appellant. Pushpinder Saini QC and Jessica Boyd (instructed by Ofcom) for the Respondent. Michael Fordham QC and Emily Neill (instructed by Towerhouse LLP) for the 2nd Interested Party. Thomas de la Mare QC and Tom Richards (instructed by DWF LLP) for the 3rd Interested Party. Tristan Jones (instructed by Constantine Cannon LLP) for the 4th Interested Party. Hearing dates : 10, 11 and 12 October 2017 ____________________
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.