Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             This decision refers to parties as they were in the FtT.
             By a decision dated 5 December 2023, FtT Judge Pinder allowed the appellant's appeal against refusal of his application "for pre-settled status / limited leave to remain under appendix EU" of the immigration rules ("the EUSS") .
             On 11 January 2024, FtT Judge Mills granted permission to appeal to the UT.
             The issues are encapsulated in the grant of permission: ...
The appellant is a Ukrainian national who, along with his wife and daughter, was granted a family permit under the EU Settlement Scheme, to join his mother-in-law in the UK, who is a relevant EEA citizen with settled status. Having entered the UK on 18/01/2023, the family sought pre-settled status under the EUSS. While his wife and daughter were granted, the appellant was refused on the basis that his relationship with the sponsor was too far distant to qualify under the EUSS rules.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.