Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellants are nationals of Bangladesh. The second appellant is the son of the first.
Their applications dated 11 th June 2013 for an entry clearance as family visitors were refused on 2 nd July 2013 as the respondent was not satisfied that they would leave the UK at the end of the period of their visit.
In a decision promulgated on 1 st May 2014, First-tier Tribunal Judge Walters dismissed their appeals under the rules.
On 17 th June 2014, First-tier Tribunal Judge Cruthers granted the appellants permission to appeal on the basis that it may be arguable that the Judge gave insufficient reasons for rejecting the evidence that might have been taken as supporting the case for the appellants.
At the hearing before me, Mr Noor relied on two grounds. The first ground was to the effect that even though the appellants received remittances from their UK relatives, they had regular earnings in Bangladesh from family owned agricultural land. That was evident from the evidence of the sponsor who stated that his parents and brother have some agricultural land. He gets enough from it. Sometimes it is not enough. His brother's study expenses are financed by the family in the UK.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.