Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the Appellant and/or any member of his family is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the Appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the Appellant and/or any member of his family. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
      This decision should be read with the earlier error of law decision issued on 13 September 2023, in which Upper Tribunal Judge Lane and I set aside the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Plowright on the basis of error of law.
      As we explained at para. 26, the effect of our error of law decision was that the remaking of the decision was to look at the narrow question of how the Appellant would reasonably likely behave on return to Gambia set into the context of his own views about the current president, as well as the background evidence about the current government's view of political dissent.
      The resumed hearing was initially listed to be heard on 18 October 2023 but had to be adjourned because both parties sought to rely upon further evidence which had not been produced in accordance with the Upper Tribunal's general directions.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.