Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Transcript provided by: Posib, Y Gilfach, Ffordd y Pentre, Nercwys, Flintshire, CH7 4EL DX26560 MOLD Tel: 01352 757273 Fax: 01352 757252 [email protected] www.posib.co.uk
APPEARANCES: For the Applicant: Mr William Seagrim For the Respondent: Mr Nathan Jones ____________________
These undertakings were to be binding until the Applicant vacates [same address given].
She was, in her fair objective assessment of the Respondent, equivocal about the issue of anger. She said:
Undoubtedly to my mind, that is the right interpretation of what was going on here. In the wake of recent communications between these parties, it represented a growing sense of frustration between them over issues relating to a four year-old child but which nevertheless should not have been dealt with in this way.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.