Civil

ELIZABETH DOIG v M'EWEN and MILLER (Court of Session)

[1828] ScotCS 04_1828_SC_facdec_937Court of Session1828

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.

Quick orient — first passages from judgment

Lord Corehouse, Ordinary. For Advocator, Jameson, Neaves. James Brown, Agent. Alt. Jeffrey, Christison. Ritchie & Miller, Agents.

Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More Civil cases

Saddiq Ahmed against Kamall Ahmed (Court of Session)

[2026] ScotCS 2026csoh26

Mohammed Ameen Mirza against The Lord Advocate and another (Court of Session)

[2026] ScotCS 2026csoh31

Saddiq Ahmed against Kamall Ahmed (Court of Session)

[2026] ScotCS 2026csoh30

56 Fellows Road Limited v ABC Block Management Limited

[2026] EWCA Civ 401

Elly Okong'o Ingan'ga and others against Browns Plantations Kenya LTD (National Personal Injury Court)

[2026] ScotSC 2026scedin10

Jarryd Luke Du Plessis (AP) for Judicial Review of decision by Secretary of State for the Home Department (Court of Session)

[2026] ScotCS 2026csoh7

Common Room

Discussion

0 comments · About the Common Room →

No comments yet — start the discussion.

Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.

Civil

ELIZABETH DOIG v M'EWEN and MILLER (Court of Session)

[1828] ScotCS 04_1828_SC_facdec_937Court of Session1828

Cite this case in OSCOLA →

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.