Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             The appellant's case is that he was innocent of the offences, for which he was convicted, and that the prosecution had been politically motivated. It is also his case that he is at risk in Albania because he is perceived to be a member of the Lushnje-Aldo Bare Gang, which had led to serious physical attacks upon him in prison in 2003, 2007, 2010 and 2011, after which he had been placed in segregation.
             In rejecting MC's claims, the SSHD accepted the following facts:
             The SSHD did not accept that:
(i) MC would be at risk on return to Albania because he could seek protection from the authorities.
(iii) MC had given a reasonable explanation for failing to claim asylum in Spain or Italy.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.