Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Hamilton then brought an advocation of this judgment, stating that there were no grounds for limiting the proof, which should have been one at large, and founding on the cases of Sands, 20th June 1829, and Baird v. Officer, 9th June 1830, in support of the competency of the advocation.
Lord Ordinary, Cockburn. Act. Maitland, Wm. Bell. Alt. Dean of Fac. (Hope,) Monteith. John Cullen, W. S. and Alex. Hamilton, W. S. Agents. S. Clerk.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.