Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant: Mr R De Mello of Counsel, instructed by ASH Immigration Services
             This has been a remote hearing which has not been objected to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was by video, using Teams. There were no technical difficulties for the hearing itself and the papers were all available electronically.
             This appeal was originally joined with that of Saqib Parvez, UI-2023-000993, HU/54068/2022, who was the Appellant's son. Mr Parvez has sadly passed away since his appeal was also granted permission to appeal thereby bringin an end to proceedings in respect of him. This does not however affect the Appellant's continuing appeal.
              The Appellant appeals with permission against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Parkes promulgated on 6 January 2023, in which the Appellant's appeal against the decision to refuse her human rights claim dated 31 May 2022 was dismissed.
              The Appellant is a national of Pakistan, born on 10 January 1970, who applied for Entry Clearance to the United Kingdom to join Akhtar Parveez, her husband, on 21 December 2021.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.