Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant: Ms A Seehra of Counsel instructed by Indra Sebastian, Solicitors
The appellant first entered the United Kingdom on 23 rd September, 2007, with entry clearance as a student from 5 th September, 2007, to 31 st October, 2010. On 16 th February, 2011, the appellant was granted leave to remain as a Tier 4 (General) Student until 25 th June, 2011. On 12 th April, 2011, he was granted leave to remain as a Tier 1 (Post-Study Work) Migrant until 12 th April, 2013, subject to conditions restricting employment and prohibiting recourse to public funds.
On 8 th May, 2013, the respondent refused to vary the appellant�s leave to remain and gave directions for the appellant�s removal from the United Kingdom. He appealed to the First-tier Tribunal and his appeal was heard by First-tier Tribunal Judge Adio, at Hatton Cross on 3 rd February, 2014.
� You have claimed 25 points for Access to Funds as required under provision (b) of Table 4 of Appendix A of the Immigration Rules.
On the basis of the documents you have provided, however, the Secretary of State is not satisfied that these meet the requirements specified under Appendix A of the Immigration Rules and you do not qualify for the award of 25 points in this area.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.