Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
REASONS FOR FINDING THAT THE TRIBUNAL MADE AN ERROR OF LAW, SUCH THAT ITS DECISION FALLS TO BE SET ASIDE
The appellant is a citizen of Nepal who was born on 29 December 1988. Her father is a retired British Gurkha. He enlisted with the Brigade of Gurkhas in 1966. His certificate of service dated 22 May 1990 stated that his military conduct was exemplary and that he had completed 24 years loyal service in the British Army. The appellant�s parents came to the UK in August 2011. She applied for entry clearance to settle in the UK with her parents. This was refused by the Entry Clearance Officer.
The appellant appealed the decision and her appeal was heard before First-tier Tribunal Judge Chohan on 30 September 2014. The appeal was dismissed. Grounds of Appeal are dated 20 th November 2014.
�It is arguable that there was a material error of law that could have made a material difference to the outcome for the reasons given in the application which I will not simply repeat�.
i) adopting a confused and incorrect approach to the proportionality exercise required under Article 8
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.