Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
              On 26 February 2024, the First Tier Tribunal ('FtT') dismissed the appellant's appeal against the respondent's refusal to grant his asylum and human rights claim. The appellant appealed with permission against the decision of the FtT to the Upper Tribunal on the basis that the judge's decision involved the making of an error of law.
              At a statutory appeal hearing held on 27 September 2024 before Upper Tribunal Judge Rintoul, both parties agreed that the decision of the FtT involved the making of an error of law for the reasons set out in the grounds of appeal (which are not repeated here) and that the judge had acted unfairly by taking a number of points against the appellant, rendering the findings of fact as to the risk facing the appellant unsustainable.
              In a decision dated 19 January 2025, UTJ Rintoul allowed the appellant's appeal, set aside the FtT judgment, and directed that the case should be remade in the Upper Tribunal with no preserved findings, stating at [3] that the errors were not so serious that it would be appropriate to remit the decision to the FtT.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.