Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of WordWave International Limited A Merrill Communications Company 190 Fleet Street London EC4A 2AG Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838 (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
Mr S Cox (instructed by Refugee Legal Centre) appeared on behalf of the Claimant Mr R Kellar (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) appeared on behalf of the Defendant ____________________
That makes clear that, in the view of the Adjudicator, he recognised that there was a well-founded fear of persecution at the hands of the KDP and the Islamic movement but that protection could be afforded to him if he was within an area under the control of the PUK. That is the significant finding on which Mr Cox relies.
Factor (2), failure to comply with conditions, is simply wrong. There had never been any such claim. Quite why that box was ticked other than because of the greatest degree of carelessness is not at all clear.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.