Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(DAR Transcript of WordWave International Limited A Merrill Communications Company 190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838 Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
Mr P Lewis (instructed by the Immigration Advisory Service) appeared on behalf of the Appellant. Miss D Sen Gupta (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) appeared on behalf of the Respondent. ____________________
He so held because, as it seemed to him, the immigration�judge had given only these reasons for his finding at paragraph�29:
On a first stage reconsideration, Senior�Immigration�Judge�Chalkley found there to be this, as well as another, error of law and sent the case for second�stage reconsideration, which in due course was determined on its merits against the appellant.
In spite of some convoluted syntax, it is clear that Immigration�Judge�Oakley was saying that any such endeavour would be viewed with complete scepticism by the Home�Office and, in so holding, he was clearly right.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.