Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This is the appellant's appeal against the decision of Judge Pullig made following a hearing at Hatton Cross on 27 th July 2016.
The appellant is a citizen of Bangladesh born on 20 th August 1982. He entered the UK on 2 nd September 2009 as a Tier 4 (General) Student with leave to expire on 1 st January 2012. He was then granted further leave to remain on 25 th July 2012 to expire on 28 th August 2014. On the same day he made an application as a family member of an EU national which was refused on 8 th November 2014. On 4 th December he applied for a Tier 4 (General) Student extension without a CAS.
On 17 th February 2015 he made an application on the basis of his private and family life, which was refused on 22 nd April 2015 and it is this decision which was the subject of the appeal before the Immigration Judge.
The appellant attempted to have the appeal adjourned prior to the hearing on the grounds that he was unwell. The adjournment application was refused and the case was dealt with on the basis of submissions by the representative and the Presenting Officer.
The judge concluded that the appellant could not meet the requirements of the Immigration Rules. He then wrote
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.