Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant: Mr B Shabbir, advocate, instructed by McGlashen MacKay Solicitors
            The Secretary of State appeals the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Doyle (the Judge) promulgated on 28 March 2024 to allow the appellant's appeal against the refusal of his human rights claim. For ease of reference, we refer to the parties as they were before the First-tier Tribunal in this decision. No anonymity order was sought, and we did not consider that there was any basis on which an order should be made.
            On 12 December 2014, the appellant applied for leave to remain. His application was refused, and he appealed the decision. His appeal was allowed on human rights grounds in a determination promulgated on 26 August 2016. As a result of his successful appeal, the appellant was granted leave to remain on 25 October 2016, which was valid until 25 April 2019.
            On 28 June 2019, the appellant made an application for further leave to remain. The application was successful, and the appellant was granted leave to remain valid until 11 May 2022. The basis on which leave to remain was granted was not clear, save that it was on the basis of the appellant's family and private life, which Mr Shabbir helpfully noted was set out at page 5 of the respondent's bundle that was before the First-tier Tribunal.
            The appellant made an application for further leave to remain on 10 May 2022, which was refused on 10 March 2023.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.