Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The only distinction between this case and the last was, that, in the present, which was an action of reduction of a decree-arbitral, the summons contained no conclusion for expences at all. The Lord Ordinary (Medwyn) in order to ascertain the practice, made a remit to the deputy keeper and commissioners of the signet, who returned the report above quoted. His Lordship afterwards made avizandum, with the debate, to the Court, upon minutes.
Act. for Gordon, G. Jos. Bell and Arch. Bell. For Hyslop and Co. Skene and M'Neill. Vans Hathorn, W. S. and John Thorburn, W. E. Agents. M. Clerk.
Act. for Heggie and Co. Boswell and Moncrieff. For Stark and Selcrig, Shaw and Skene. J. Macandrew, S. S. C. and J. Donaldson, S. S. C. Agents. B. Clerk.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.