Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Vice President of the Court of Appeal Criminal Division (LORD JUSTICE ROSE) and MR JUSTICE LEVESON ____________________
Richard Gordon QC & Stephen Cragg (instructed by Messrs Howells) for the Claimants David Bean QC & David N Jones (instructed by Ms Susan Ross, South Yorkshire Police Service) for the Defendant Rabinder Singh & James Strachan (instructed by Treasury Solicitor) for the Interested Party Hearing date : 14 March 2002 ____________________
HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT : APPROVED BY THE COURT FOR HANDING DOWN (SUBJECT TO EDITORIAL CORRECTIONS) ____________________
New technologies include live scan (the capturing of fingerprint impressions electronically which can then be downloaded in digital form for processing) and live-id which can be undertaken either at a police station or at a remote site or on patrol thus confirming the identity of a suspect or arrestee immediately.
It is important to appreciate that the DNA database is not a list of suspects; rather, it will show only a �hit� of the DNA profile of an individual which matches that from DNA recovered at a crime scene. Given that DNA can be detected from very small samples (such as might be found on the saliva on a cigarette end) the power of the technique both to eliminate those who might have been suspected or incriminate others is enormous.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.