Intellectual Property

NAH Holdings Ltd & Anor v KBF Enterprises Ltd & Anor

[2022] EWHC IPEC 323High Court (IP Enterprise)2022

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.

Quick orient — first passages from judgment

Christ Pearson (instructed by CLP Solicitors) for the Claimants Aaron Wood, Trade Mark Attorney of Brandsmiths SL for the Defendants Judgment on the papers ____________________

Whether the defendants have no real prospect of successfully defending the claim

Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More Intellectual Property cases

Luxe World Ltd v Touch of Vogue Ltd & Anor

[2026] EWHC IPEC 148

No Climb Products Ltd v Gas Safe Europe Ltd

[2026] EWHC IPEC 908

Banham Patent Locks Limited v Danny Rogers (t/a Rogers and Sons)

[2026] EWHC 528 (Pat)

David Parsons v Convatec Limited

[2026] EWHC 300 (Pat)

David Parsons v Convatec Limited

[2026] EWHC 98 (Pat)

Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd v ZTE Corporation

[2026] EWHC 999 (Pat)

Common Room

Discussion

0 comments · About the Common Room →

No comments yet — start the discussion.

Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.