Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This is an appeal against the decision promulgated on 29 January 2014 of First-tier Tribunal Judge Monro which refused the appeal against the Secretary of State�s decision dated 25 April 2013 refusing entry clearance as a dependent parent.
The respondent refused the application as paragraph E-ECDR.2.5 of Appendix FM of the Immigration Rules was not met. This states:
The applicant or, if the applicant and their partner are the sponsor�s parents or grandparents, the applicant�s partner, must be unable, even with the practical and financial help of the sponsor, to obtain the required level of care in the country where they are living, because-
(a) it is not available and there is no person in that country who can reasonably provide it; or
The respondent found that this paragraph was not met as it had not been shown that �Afghan culture is so restrictive that it is not possible for you to receive car there.�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.