Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, [the appellant] ( and/or any member of his family, expert, witness or other person the Tribunal considers should not be identified ) is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant ( and/or other person ). Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
              This is an appeal against the determination of First-tier Tribunal Judge Hobson promulgated on 24 th August 2022, following a hearing remotely by CVP on 18 th August 2022. In the determination, the judge dismissed the appeal of the Appellant, whereupon the Appellant subsequently applied for, and was granted, permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal, and thus the matter comes before me.
              Given that this is was a second appeal, with the first one having been before Judge Maka, the judge had regard to the rule in Devaseelan which states that the first determination will be the starting point for any subsequent judge looking into the matter.
              In cross-examination the Appellant had confirmed that none of his family had actually come to any harm at the hands of his wife's family "but they had told the Appellant they were being verbally abused regularly" (paragraph 28).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.