Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Anna McKenna KC and Andrea Watts (instructed by Shepherd Harris & Co Ltd) for the applicant Mark Jarman KC and Jonathan Evans (instructed by MSB Solicitors) for the respondent Hearing dates: 15 and 16 April ____________________
in an intolerable situation (Article 13(b)), and (2) DC objects to being returned and has obtained an age and degree of maturity at which it is appropriate to take account of his views, Article 13(2). Mr Jarman and Mr Evans sensibly withdrew M's defence under Article 13(2) in closing submissions. Thus, the only defence I must address is under Article 13(b).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.