Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
MR. S. COYLE (instructed by Legal Services) appeared on behalf of the Applicant Local Authority. MISS B. ROBERTS (Lonsdale and Mayall Solicitors) appeared on behalf of the First and Second Respondents. MS. M. HAMILTON (of McMillen Hamilton McCarthy Solicitors) appeared on behalf of the Children's Guardian. ____________________
This judgment was delivered in private.�� The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved.�� All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with.�� Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.
They would have to make an application to obtain any of those orders. So he confirms at para.18 that an adoption order made by a court here will be recognised in Nigeria. A child arrangements order will not be enforced in the same way, it would be regarded as the legal basis for Mr. and Mrs. A having B in their care, but no more than that.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.