Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             Withdrawal of concession - With no objection by the appellant, the respondent is GRANTED permission to withdraw its concession that the appellant and Stefan Emilov were and are in a genuine and subsisting relationship. For the avoidance of doubt, the appellant maintains that the relationship was and is genuine and this Tribunal has made no findings on the point.
             Adjournment - With no objection by the respondent, the appellant's application to adjourn the remaking hearing on 24th September 2024 is GRANTED.
             Preserved findings from Judge Nixon's judgment
             On the appellant's adjournment application, on the one hand, it has arisen in the context of the appellant's own disclosure. On the other hand, the issue which the respondent now seeks to address is fundamental to her claim, has never been tested in evidence and there are witnesses she seeks to call. In the circumstances, a fair hearing could not take place today.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.